Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
N
ngx_http_voms_module
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
cnafsd
ngx_http_voms_module
Commits
38d43bc8
Commit
38d43bc8
authored
2 months ago
by
Francesco Giacomini
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add cert configuration for an untrusted voms
parent
83e10dbb
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!27
Resolve "Use a throw-away CA for the tests"
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
t/conf.d/untrusted_voms.conf
+25
-0
25 additions, 0 deletions
t/conf.d/untrusted_voms.conf
with
25 additions
and
0 deletions
t/conf.d/untrusted_voms.conf
0 → 100644
+
25
−
0
View file @
38d43bc8
[
untrusted_voms
]
default_bits
=
2048
default_keyfile
= ${
ENV
::
CA_NAME
}/
certs
/
untrusted_voms
.
key
.
pem
distinguished_name
=
untrusted_voms_dn
prompt
=
no
encrypt_key
=
no
default_md
=
sha512
x509_extensions
=
untrusted_voms_extensions
[
untrusted_voms_dn
]
C
=
IT
O
=
IGI
CN
=
untrusted
-
voms
.
example
[
untrusted_voms_extensions
]
basicConstraints
=
critical
,
CA
:
FALSE
subjectKeyIdentifier
=
hash
keyUsage
=
critical
,
digitalSignature
extendedKeyUsage
=
serverAuth
,
clientAuth
authorityKeyIdentifier
=
keyid
,
issuer
subjectAltName
=
DNS
:
untrusted
-
voms
.
example
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment